Content Moderation
A published synthetic benchmark measured 91.5% accuracy and a 41ms batch-average time per item for content moderation.
The Challenge
Every platform with user-generated content faces the same dilemma: moderate too aggressively and you silence legitimate users; moderate too loosely and you expose your community to harm.
The software also has to make that decision quickly and consistently. Content moderation needs to be:
- Fast — Users expect instant feedback when they post. A 500ms moderation delay feels broken.
- Accurate — False positives drive users away. False negatives create liability.
- Nuanced — Keyword filters can't distinguish "I'll kill it in the presentation" from an actual threat. Sarcasm, slang, coded language, and cultural context all matter.
- Affordable at scale — Every message, every comment, every post needs moderation. At 100K+ items per day, per-call pricing adds up fast.
Rules catch explicit policy constraints but long keyword lists struggle with context. Direct LLM calls can handle nuance, but each request adds model latency, token usage, and a provider dependency. The right comparison uses your actual prompt, traffic, and error costs.
How Sparkient Solves It
Sparkient's compiled decision pipeline gives you a policy-specific model whose quality and latency can be measured before integration.
The Three-Stage Pipeline
-
CEL Rules (<1ms) — Instant handling of blocklists, allowlists, and hard policy constraints. New accounts posting links? Auto-review. Known spam domains? Auto-reject. Established users with clean history? Lower scrutiny threshold.
-
Compiled Classifier (<100ms target) — A compiled model trained on policy examples generated by an LLM teacher or supplied by you. It can learn patterns represented in the data; verify difficult language and every consequential class on a held-out set.
-
Optional LLM Escalation — Low-confidence cloud decisions can call an LLM. Its latency depends on the model, prompt, provider, and retries; measure and tune the rate because escalated requests have a different credit profile.
What Makes This Different
Your moderation policy isn't the same as everyone else's. A gaming platform tolerates competitive trash talk. A children's education app doesn't. A financial forum needs to catch pump-and-dump schemes. A healthcare community needs sensitivity around self-harm.
Sparkient trains a model on your policy. You define what "approve," "review," and "reject" mean for your platform. The LLM teacher generates training data that matches your specific guidelines. The compiled model enforces them.
Code Example
import httpx
# Moderate a piece of content
response = httpx.post(
"https://api.sparkient.ai/api/v1/decide",
headers={"Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_API_KEY"},
json={
"decision_type": "content-moderation",
"input": {
"text": "You're absolutely garbage at this game, uninstall already",
"user_id": "player_789",
"account_age_days": 45,
"previous_violations": 1
}
}
)
result = response.json()
# Illustrative response. Values will vary by model and input.
# {
# "decision": "review",
# "confidence": 0.82,
# "latency_ms": 38,
# "stage": "classifier"
# }For offline or edge deployment on eligible plans:
from sparkient_edge import EdgePredictor
predictor = EdgePredictor.from_bundle("moderation.zip")
result = predictor.predict({"text": "Free money! Click here now!!!"})
# Inspect result.decision, result.confidence, and result.stageBenchmark Results
| Metric | Published synthetic run | What to validate | |--------|-------------------------|------------------| | Macro F1 | 0.900 | Per-class quality on representative held-out content | | Accuracy | 91.5% | Error cost for the target moderation policy | | Batch-average time per item | 41ms | End-to-end p50, p95, and p99 under target load |
This is a synthetic noisy-data result, not a customer-production result or a universal comparison with a live LLM. The benchmark's traditional baselines used structured fields while Sparkient also used a text encoder, so it is not a matched text-model comparison. The runner timed one batch and divided by the item count; it did not measure per-request p95.
Get Started
Define your moderation policy, train a compiled model, and test it against representative held-out cases. Start with the free tier — 5,000 credits, no credit card required.
Import this template
Start with a small evaluation. Import a decision type, customise it, and test it on representative cases.
Import Template